DFI PW65-D Slot 1 Motherboard Reviewed by Vijay Anand (2/6/99)
<Introduction><The Good><The Bad><Conclusion><Rating> IntroductionIntel officially launched the
i810 chipset and the Celeron-466 on the 26th of April. That same day, DFI announced a new
series of i810-based motherboards and they were the first and only one to do so. Now, some
of you may ask how is that possible for DFI to be the only one. The simple reason is, both
Intel and DFI co-developed the i810 chipset and as such, DFI has a lead in manufacturing
and marketing their boards based on the i810 chipset. Surprisingly, even the sample boards
for Intel are made by DFI. Hmm... Usually, we see Asus, Abit or a few other big-board
makers coming out with new boards first but it looks like DFI caught up this round due to
it's keen interest. The GoodThis board I have here is the DFI PW65-D and I think the D stands
for Deluxe as DFI told me this is the best board they have at hand now. They will be
manufacturing and marketing this board first before making simplified versions of it
later. The overall look of the board does give a good impression because every bit of
space is used thoughtfully and the positioning of the components on this compact board is
near excellent. The Slot-1 Universal Retention Mechanism (URM) is already fixed on to the motherboard and it is the best type of URM I've seen to date. It uses a kind of slider on both sides to lock and free the processor. Therefore, removing processors from this board is as easy as removing a PCI card with almost no force unlike the vast majority of the other boards. All external power connectors such as Com-port, LPT port, USB ports, PS/2 ports, sound and game connectors are all PC-99 colour-spec compliant. Installation of the board is very much the same as other boards. when you enter the bios, you'll find that it's changed quite a bit from all these years. It's a change for the better and it provides far more options than the normal bios we've seen to-date. The boot-up for this board is the fastest of any I've see to date and I really mean it! I guess it's because of the new Bios and especially the 4Mbit FWH, which holds the bios for both the system and the video. Installing the drivers to use the built-in video and integrated Audio codec + updating the inf. file to let windows recognize the i810 chipset is a cinch! Just pop the CD in, Auto-start menu will appear and just click on the needed items to update windows with new drivers. That's all! I was worried in the beginning but there's no problem at all. The given CD also comes with the Hardware Doctor monitoring utility and the Yamaha play-center, mixer and soft-synthesizer. The sound is very similar to that of an SB16 which is OK because of the intended market this board is selling to. Here are a few screen-shots:
Under the Sound Properties, you'll find a new column for
Stereo-Wide. Depending on the user, he may or may not like the effect but you can mute it
if you don't want that option. The picture on the Hardware-Doctor only show's that it's
tracking the chassis fan. But I also had the CPU fan and another fan connected to the
motherboard but they were only 2-pinned connectors, hence I can't track their status.
|
The Test
The processor used for this test is a C-300A slot-1 which is of the SL32A batch overclockable to 450 and a C-400 PPGA which is of the SL37X with an Asus Slocket. Since I acquired the C-300A much latter, I can't show any results for it yet. The C-400 PPGA I had was not overclockable at all even with another MSI slocket. I will investigate that latter.
Test Configuration |
|
Processor(s): | Intel Celeron-400 PPGA
SL37X Malay + Asus Slocket & Intel Celeron-300A Slot-1 SL32A Malay. |
RAM: | 1 - 64MB LGS-7J SDRAM DIMM |
Hard Drive(s): | IBM Deskstar-3 3.2G |
Video Card(s): | Built in i752 graphics engine |
Bus Master Drivers: | Windows 98 Bus Mastering Drivers |
Video Drivers: | 4.11.01.1161 Version PV1.0 |
Operation System(s): | Windows 98 (build 4.10.1998)+ Direct-X 6.1 |
Area Tested | C-400 (66x6) |
---|---|
CPU Integer (MIPS) | 1172.421 |
CPU Floating Point (MFLOPS) | 461.7393 |
Video(2D) (MPixeles/s) | 65.34016 |
Direct3D (MPixeles/s) | 51.48141 |
OpenGL (MPixels/s) | 37.82972 |
Memory (MB/s) | 666.8571 |
Cached Disk (MB/s) | 64.7826 |
Uncached Disk (MB/s) | 1.785674 |
CPU speed | C-400A (66 x 6) |
ZD CPU-Mark99 | 29.6 |
ZD FPU-WinMark99 | 2140 |
ZD Business Winstone99 | 15.7 |
NU Sys Info (pts) | 127 |
Sisoft CPU benchmark (MIPS) | 956 |
Sisoft FPU benchmark (MFLOPS) | 271 |
Sisoft memory benchmark (MB/s) | 180 |
Quake-2 @ 640x480, Demo 1 / 2 (fps) | 44 / 41.8 |
Quake-2 @ 800x600, Demo 1 / 2 (fps) | 31.1 / 30.9 |
Quake-2 @ 1024x768, Demo 1 / 2 (fps) | 20.4 / 20.7 |
3D Mark99 (3D Marks) | 2290 |
3D Mark99 @ 800x600, Game1 / Game2 (fps) | 22.2 / 23.6 |
The quality of the integrated i752 engine is just like that of a TNT but I did notice slight clipping problems in NFS3 which I attribute it to early Intel drivers. But the gaming speed isn't much faster than a Riva-128. Since the i752 engine is able to access the memory a lot much faster, games with large textures are so much more smoother than the Riva-128 or i740 video card. So in the end, the integrated video is like how a Riva-128 or i740 video card should have been, performance similar to i740 and Riva-128 but with a quality like a Riva-TNT! I would say 3D games are still well playable at 640x480 and 800x600 which is good enough for people that are not such hard-core gamers (it suited me fine!). Intel was claiming Riva-TNT perfromace but I think it was a typo error!! (What do you think?)
The major complaint I have is that it does not have any manual voltage controls for true overclockers. Maybe the manual could improve as it's showing it's age. The CMOS-clear jumper is hard to reach when the motherboard is inside the casing. The GMC and ICH could use heatsink but it is not compulsory as it's not that hot. A 6th PCI-slot would be nice to see but such a board will cost more. The temperature sensors don't actually touch the heatsink so its temperature values aren't accurate. There is some crackling in sound very occasionally but I believe it's due to the young sound drivers. There is no SB-Link connector. Overall, new drivers released later, may improve performace better. No 133Mhz bus support until i810-E chipset arrives. Price is a little high now, but will drop down very soon.
Conclusion
This is the first i810 based motherboard in the world and it's really well made with quality components, excellent placement of components and very easy installation. This board suits extremely well for system-integrators, office PCs and low to medium-home usage (not for hard-core 3D gamers). Now this is a board that other i810 motherboard manufacturers will be referring to as a base-line for comparison and reference to make a good i810 motherboard.
MOTHERBOARD RATING
Overall Rating (Out of a maximum of 5 Star) |
|
Installation | ***** |
Performance | ****1/4 |
Price | **** |
Overclockability | **** |
Material Quality | ***** |
Stability | ***** |
Overall Rating | ****1/2 |
Copyright © 1998 by Singapore Hardware Zone. All rights reserved.
None of the above
shall be reproduced, copied and/or
modified without the permission of the WebMaster.